Go Back   Socionics Forums > Ramble Mumble

Ramble Mumble Anything goes, but please make an effort to stay positive and keep it socionics related.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #441  
Old 05/07/2008, 01:10 AM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
What if it is incorrect... What if ISTp Si goes better with ENFp Fi ?
*bumped for kensi* he seems to have disappeared!
Reply With Quote
  #442  
Old 05/07/2008, 01:34 AM
kensi's Avatar
kensi kensi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
What if it is incorrect... What if ISTp Si goes better with ENFp Fi ?
I don't know for sure...everything is so dependant on the definitions in this business......it's not impossible so you can't rule it out altogether...i just havn't heard the kind of logic (thru intertype or something of equivalence) to suggest so (unlike the other scenario which is somewhat validated thru intertype as well some of my personal experiences).......and a real case study takes too long to do....to...

If you have access to information in your competing scenario mentioned there, let me in on it, dude.
__________________
Some Sort of Si + Fi valueing type.
Reply With Quote
  #443  
Old 05/07/2008, 01:40 AM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,272
Default

I'm curious. Do you always place importance on logical definitions? (also you say it goes against your experiences. May I enquire of those experiences?)
Reply With Quote
  #444  
Old 05/07/2008, 01:51 AM
kensi's Avatar
kensi kensi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
I'm curious. Do you always place importance on logical definitions? (also you say it goes against your experiences. May I enquire of those experiences?)
Depends what you call a logical definition. To me Logic is a style. Each of the 16 types are capable of logic. T, really, is the only thing that has actual existance. F is merely the holistic interpretation of T, and S and N are the effect of the modifier of time. Where a T fits into one's prefered psychic makeup determines the type of logic one uses. I hope thaty sheds some light for you ,Bro.

T used up front represents direct logic unfiltered thru the other aspects whether temporally or intra-permanently you could say. As a supposed ENFP, i cannot stand T up front, i'm not good at it ...and fairly so cause i have a deep internal preference to let T slide a little on down the road...Te is prefered for me but it is my hidden agenda....it is somewhat weak cause Ne dominates over it to give me kind of a flexible NeTe logic in my assesments.

How about yourself,dude ?

cheers.
__________________
Some Sort of Si + Fi valueing type.
Reply With Quote
  #445  
Old 05/07/2008, 01:54 AM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,272
Default

In regards to your type. I'm back to thinking you are Ti seeking you seem to rely on structures and don't like to give Te related examples.
Reply With Quote
  #446  
Old 05/07/2008, 02:05 AM
kensi's Avatar
kensi kensi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
In regards to your type. I'm back to thinking you are Ti seeking you seem to rely on structures and don't like to give Te related examples.
that is a good point.....sometimes i wonder too....personality is very complex.

Have you considered that i might be INFp?:

INFp= Ni Fe Ti Se ....in that order of quadra function preference...


...this version is one of probably 5 or so ways of explaining this concept of Ti seeking.

(notice in the progression that Ti follows Fe...thus it seeks it out and fings it )

...it is a scenario i believed in some 3+ years ago.
__________________
Some Sort of Si + Fi valueing type.
Reply With Quote
  #447  
Old 05/07/2008, 02:08 AM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kensi View Post
Have you considered that i might be INFp?:
This is most likely scenario. It's the one that fits.

Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #448  
Old 05/07/2008, 02:34 AM
kensi's Avatar
kensi kensi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
This is most likely scenario. It's the one that fits.

Yes.

If i'm INFp then Duality is screwed ! I'm usualy more likely to fight an ESTp then attempt to live with one...haha (its not out of the question with me it never is)

Before seeing too much tunnel-vision and jumping on this scenariio, you have to consider other viable ones too...

I think i'd be more comfortable being ENTp than INFp.......

ENTP= Ne Ti Fe Si .........in terms of q-f values and in that order of strength of makeup.


Notice here that Ti seeks out Fe continously for help and receives it.

also,.... Ne-ENFp has a high degree of Ti in the superego too... so i don't know where we're going with this thread.
__________________
Some Sort of Si + Fi valueing type.

Last edited by kensi; 05/07/2008 at 02:34 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply With Quote
  #449  
Old 05/07/2008, 03:34 AM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,272
Default

Your last girlfriend was ISTj. Relations of activity.
Reply With Quote
  #450  
Old 05/07/2008, 07:38 AM
shadowpuppet's Avatar
shadowpuppet shadowpuppet is offline
the Omniscient
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 642
Default

happy birthday bro
__________________

u!




Quote:
Originally Posted by Vibration View Post
Thanks. Now I understand why Prom thinks you are the most intelligent person at this forum.
Reply With Quote
  #451  
Old 05/07/2008, 09:11 PM
complicater-complexer's Avatar
complicater-complexer complicater-complexer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,365
Default

Happy birthday Kensi but be careful not to have your face in the cake while turning off the candles.
__________________
"To live happy, live hidden."
β ST, E6 autopreservation.
Reply With Quote
  #452  
Old 05/07/2008, 09:15 PM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by complicater-complexer View Post
Happy birthday Kensi but be careful not to have your face in the cake while turning off the candles.
He looked like already happened from his video. He was a little on red side.
Reply With Quote
  #453  
Old 05/07/2008, 09:19 PM
Kanerou's Avatar
Kanerou Kanerou is offline
Omnomnom
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,367
Default

Happy 30th.

Call me anal retentive and all, but Cyclops did consider INFp for you.....many, many pages ago. INFp or ENFj. Still, I noticed that the people on MBTI Central think you may be INFP, so stick with _NFp.
__________________
http://www.formspring.me/ryeneastraelis Ask away. Naturally, I reserve the right to ignore or delete questions.

Last edited by Kanerou; 05/07/2008 at 09:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #454  
Old 08/07/2008, 08:16 AM
kensi's Avatar
kensi kensi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanerou View Post
Happy 30th.

Call me anal retentive and all, but Cyclops did consider INFp for you.....many, many pages ago. INFp or ENFj. Still, I noticed that the people on MBTI Central think you may be INFP, so stick with _NFp.
Thanks, Kany

Not really...if you follow his discernable train of though. I guess though it depends what you consider "consider" . He was quite bent on ENFj in large majority part. I do think i understand why and my hat is off to him....but i've gotten along way too well with ISTps (yes, those with the very same look as in Ganin's celebrity page...only not as weird as Mr.Bean, LOL)

INFP there, i'm confident, is quite different than INFp here....there it would make me FiNe and i know that these are a Delta value and it would have to make me INFj here (a Delta value too)

MBTI Central has little impact on me....call me anal retentive and all but other types were suggested too.....including ISFp which i find to be a most interesting suggestion and one which i havn't looked at for a long time....but i doubt that Chinosleep will think that i am the same type as he...i dunno...let's ask him.

IMO.
__________________
Some Sort of Si + Fi valueing type.
Reply With Quote
  #455  
Old 08/07/2008, 04:08 PM
Kanerou's Avatar
Kanerou Kanerou is offline
Omnomnom
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kensi View Post
Thanks, Kany

Not really...if you follow his discernable train of though. I guess though it depends what you consider "consider" . He was quite bent on ENFj in large majority part. I do think i understand why and my hat is off to him....but i've gotten along way too well with ISTps (yes, those with the very same look as in Ganin's celebrity page...only not as weird as Mr.Bean, LOL)

INFP there, i'm confident, is quite different than INFp here....there it would make me FiNe and i know that these are a Delta value and it would have to make me INFj here (a Delta value too)

MBTI Central has little impact on me....call me anal retentive and all but other types were suggested too.....including ISFp which i find to be a most interesting suggestion and one which i havn't looked at for a long time....but i doubt that Chinosleep will think that i am the same type as he...i dunno...let's ask him.

IMO.
Please. Kanerou.

I am INFP/ENFp. And I still am not so sure about automatic j/p switch.

*shrugs* That's fine. If you're talking about MB, that's ISFP. Hey, we can ask.
__________________
http://www.formspring.me/ryeneastraelis Ask away. Naturally, I reserve the right to ignore or delete questions.
Reply With Quote
  #456  
Old 09/07/2008, 06:33 AM
kensi's Avatar
kensi kensi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanerou View Post
Please. Kanerou.

I am INFP/ENFp. And I still am not so sure about automatic j/p switch.

*shrugs* That's fine. If you're talking about MB, that's ISFP. Hey, we can ask.
The switch only works if you are a "Function as Primordial"Believer. If you are the rather more pragmatic "personality index as primordial" Believer...then in fact a switch may not be necessary. While nobody may claim to want to talk philosophy...in the end it is a philosophical answer....and you cannot compare apples and oranges as the saying goes.

My definition of ISFp is Si dominant. You can scrap the whole description as it has only an auxiliary effect on me. In the other forum it was suggested that i may be Si dominant as in ISFp ( references were made to ISFJ on the other forum ). That is still atheory that i have yet to fully dismiss....but then if i am Si dominant how the heck do you explain my largely dominant intuitive faculties??

U there Chinosleep ?
__________________
Some Sort of Si + Fi valueing type.
Reply With Quote
  #457  
Old 09/08/2008, 09:15 AM
kensi's Avatar
kensi kensi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 674
Default

i wanna add another post to this thread......



I have made my decision...... based on several years of research.....and this last recent inquest into my type...after thinking it all over again.....=I am ENFP for sure!
__________________
Some Sort of Si + Fi valueing type.
Reply With Quote
  #458  
Old 10/08/2008, 08:55 AM
SG's Avatar
SG SG is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,502
Default

If I didn't know better (judging by screaming signature), I would have thought you're under pressure from your peers and you constantly feel the need to prove your type to them....seriously?
Reply With Quote
  #459  
Old 12/08/2008, 11:20 AM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,272
Default

Seems like Fe valueing by kensi
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2007 SOCIONICS.COM