| Socionics Personals |  | Female
Straight
16-25
Oceania
Libra
ENFj |
|  | Male
Straight
16-25
Middle East
Sagittarius
INTj |
|  | Male
Straight
26-35
North America
Pisces
INXj |
| | Join now! |
Who is who?Learn how to convert between different systems
V.I.An introduction into the widely used Socionics Visual Identification technique
TestsA collection of Socionics related tests and quizes
Q & AsAsk a Socionics related question or provide an answer to an existing one
ArticlesVarious articles on the subject of Socionics and Types in general
ForumsWant to discuss Type? Head to Socionics Forums!
|
| Questions & Answers |
| Question #1223375513 | Tuesday, 7-Oct-2008 |
|
|
| In Socionics, Duality is generally thought to be the "ideal" relationship. However, in MBTI, relations of Supervision like INTJ-ENFp are often promoted as the best. The problem is that, in Socionics, Supervision tends to be thought of as one of the least compatible relationships. So what gives? Why the contradiction? And more importantly, which system is right, and why? -- Krig (INTj) |
Your Answers: 1+ |
| A1 I think supervisory relationships are good at achieving material goods, but the love and understanding isn't there. -- Anonymous |
|
|
| A2 Socionics is right, of course. -- Anonymous |
| A3 The reason for this is probably that people usually are not the same type in Socionics and in MBTI, so it is not possible to compare the relationships system in the two theories - they are simply about different people. -- Anonymous |
| A4 The typing system for Socionics is different from MBTI. MBTI tends to type people based on misconceptions of the functions, such as social=extrovert, strong logic is always NT, etc. -- An INFj |
| *Please note that the opinions expressed are not necessarily those of socionics.com* |
Page 1 |
| Would you like to add anything? |
(When posting, we ask you to make the effort to qualify your opinions.)
|
|
