| Socionics Personals |  | Female
Straight
16-25
Oceania
Libra
ENFj |
|  | Male
Straight
16-25
Middle East
Sagittarius
INTj |
|  | Male
Straight
26-35
North America
Pisces
INXj |
| | Join now! |
Who is who?Learn how to convert between different systems
V.I.An introduction into the widely used Socionics Visual Identification technique
TestsA collection of Socionics related tests and quizes
Q & AsAsk a Socionics related question or provide an answer to an existing one
ArticlesVarious articles on the subject of Socionics and Types in general
ForumsWant to discuss Type? Head to Socionics Forums!
|
| Questions & Answers |
| Question #1161806051 | Wednesday, 25-Oct-2006 |
|
|
| Why do socionists claim that type has no relevance to career choice? Or is this assertion mistaken? While other typological circles may encourage over-stereotyping of "suitable" jobs, there seems to be no need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. The existential implication of cognitive metabolism is directly proportional to differential functional resiliency over time. All jobs are by nature more demanding in some areas than others. Therefore, people who are weaker in, for example, emotional stamina may generally best avoid roles which professionally require a great deal of it, etc. -- anonymous |
Your Answers: 1+ |
| A1 Please give the names of those socionists so we can ridicule them in public! -- Dr. Zoidberg |
|
|
A2 Ahh ... so apparently, it is a point of controversy.  -- anonymous |
| *Please note that the opinions expressed are not necessarily those of socionics.com* |
Page 1 |
| Would you like to add anything? |
(When posting, we ask you to make the effort to qualify your opinions.)
|
|
