Go Back   Socionics Forums > Ramble Mumble

Ramble Mumble Anything goes, but please make an effort to stay positive and keep it socionics related.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 24/07/2009, 05:38 AM
Arctures Arctures is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15
Default

EII Your Result
LII These types might also be considered
IEI
EIE
ILI These types are not very likely
ESI
LIE
LSI
IEE These types are quite unlikely
SEI
ILE
ESE
SLI These types are extremely unlikely
LSE
SEE
SLE


neat, it pegged my LII tendencies
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 28/07/2009, 12:29 PM
complicater-complexer's Avatar
complicater-complexer complicater-complexer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,374
Default

I could finally force myself to do the test. The results are quite surprising for me, I don't know how did these results come up:

Test results

LIIYour result

ILI
EII These types might also be considered
LIE

LSI
IEI These types are not very likely
ILE
SLI

EIE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
IEE

SEI
SLE these types are extremely unlikely
ESE
SEE

How is SLE one of the extremely unlikely types? This test must be messed up.
__________________
"To live happy, live hidden."
β ST, E6 autopreservation.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 28/07/2009, 03:57 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
House Robot
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by complicater-complexer View Post
I could finally force myself to do the test. The results are quite surprising for me, I don't know how did these results come up:

Test results

LIIYour result

ILI
EII These types might also be considered
LIE

LSI
IEI These types are not very likely
ILE
SLI

EIE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
IEE

SEI
SLE these types are extremely unlikely
ESE
SEE

How is SLE one of the extremely unlikely types? This test must be messed up.
Which means that, based on your result on this test, your most likely type is ILI. We already know that you are not an LII, so that type is not an option. And we also know for certain that you are not an SLE. The only two possible types for you are still SLI and ILI, and now it seems as though those who suggested ILI were probably right.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 15/08/2009, 04:35 PM
remo remo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by complicater-complexer View Post
I could finally force myself to do the test.
so there must be something wrong with the test.. don't force yourself.

i'm just poking a funny at you with my stick.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11/01/2010, 08:39 AM
Jaskal248 Jaskal248 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18
Default

Your result
SEE
These types might also be considered
SLE IEE ILE
These types are not very likely
SEI SLI IEI ILI
These types are quite unlikely
ESE LSE EIE LIE
these types are extremely unlikely
LSI EII LII ESI


Couldn't get that damn table to work. . . >_<
And still don't totally agree with SEE I think. . .
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 16/01/2010, 01:50 PM
energystar energystar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13
Default

Your result
ESE
These types might also be considered
LSE ESI LSI
These types are not very likely
SEE SLE SEI SLI
These types are quite unlikely
EIE LIE EII LII
these types are extremely unlikely
IEE ILE IEI ILI

I took the test three times with a few days inbetween. I also changed the questions I was a bit unsure of on each round. I still got ESE every single time.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 16/01/2010, 03:10 PM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,284
Default

Cool, I noticed your name, pseudonym rather, popping up elsewhere recently, seems you probably are ESE after all. Glad if you've found your type, and also somewhat bemused as my VI of ESE/SEI seems to be accurate, hmmm, even a broken clock is right twice a day, lol.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 16/01/2010, 08:42 PM
energystar energystar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13
Default

Yeah it looks like it.
I actually never considered ESE/ESFJ before I started getting VI'ed as one. In MBTI that makes me a guardian/traditionalist and when I first started reading up on personality types I immediately dismissed all types of that temperament as a possibility since I have never been very traditional.

But I guess it can be interpreted in other ways than just following the tried and true route through life.

Last edited by energystar; 16/01/2010 at 08:43 PM. Reason: correcting grammar
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 25/01/2010, 12:41 AM
Nik Nik is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 13
Default

Your result ILI

These types might also be considered LII ILE IEI

These types are not very likely SLI LIE EII LSI
These types are quite unlikely IEE SLE SEI EIE
These types are extremely unlikely LSE ESI SEE ESE
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 26/01/2010, 05:58 PM
ENTroP ENTroP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 112
Default

Typed me LIE, with ILE as the next option... This is the 2nd test to consistently type me LIE D:

I'm gonna stick with ILE, because my interactions are consistent with ILE, semiduality with SLI, mirror with LII and duality with SEI. And most definitely lots and lots of Activity with ESE. Unless I flip flop types... Which goes against orthodox socionic theory... Also, don't get along very well with ESI.

Last edited by ENTroP; 26/01/2010 at 06:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10/03/2010, 02:24 PM
MegaDoomer's Avatar
MegaDoomer MegaDoomer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Test results

ILI - Your result
SLI ILE LII - These types might also be considered
SLE IEI LSI SEI - These types are not very likely
LIE IEE LSE EII - These types are quite unlikely
SEE ESI EIE ESE - these types are extremely unlikely

This test seems to be quite okay. However, INTj vs. INTp is still a hard choice for me. I have attributes of both sides, j and p. It depends on the test how my result looks like.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10/03/2010, 03:33 PM
Kanerou's Avatar
Kanerou Kanerou is offline
Omnomnom
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaDoomer View Post
Test results

ILI - Your result
SLI ILE LII - These types might also be considered
SLE IEI LSI SEI - These types are not very likely
LIE IEE LSE EII - These types are quite unlikely
SEE ESI EIE ESE - these types are extremely unlikely

This test seems to be quite okay. However, INTj vs. INTp is still a hard choice for me. I have attributes of both sides, j and p. It depends on the test how my result looks like.
Try looking at the functions rather than the dichotomies. Rationality and Irrationality aren't always obvious, as shown by people who start out as one and later switch to the other. Which suits you better, Alpha quadra or Gamma quadra? Which do you find yourself less attracted to, Se or Fe? Also, remember that what seems right in theory may be wrong in practice, so always keep your eyes open for contradictions and be willing to change your mindset if necessary.
__________________
http://www.formspring.me/ryeneastraelis Ask away. Naturally, I reserve the right to ignore or delete questions.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10/03/2010, 03:42 PM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,284
Default

Megadoomer, what are your thoughts on this?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10/03/2010, 05:34 PM
MegaDoomer's Avatar
MegaDoomer MegaDoomer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Thanks Kanerou and Cyclops!

@Cyclops:
I've seen this already and I was quite surprised that someone wrote a whole article about that problem. It helps a bit, but it's difficult to understand socionics if you only had to do with mbti before. Well, I often appear very J-like on he outside and some others think I'm very structured. Indeed I'm always trying to be punctual and can become angry if others aren't. But on the other side, I'm a terrible procrastinator and working space is typically unorganized.

I think I'll have to think more about the facts which are stated in this article.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11/03/2010, 12:45 AM
narcissus's Avatar
narcissus narcissus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 9
Default

Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11/03/2010, 04:31 PM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MegaDoomer View Post
Thanks Kanerou and Cyclops!

@Cyclops:
I've seen this already and I was quite surprised that someone wrote a whole article about that problem. It helps a bit, but it's difficult to understand socionics if you only had to do with mbti before. Well, I often appear very J-like on he outside and some others think I'm very structured. Indeed I'm always trying to be punctual and can become angry if others aren't. But on the other side, I'm a terrible procrastinator and working space is typically unorganized.

I think I'll have to think more about the facts which are stated in this article.
So you're INTp then?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11/03/2010, 05:33 PM
MegaDoomer's Avatar
MegaDoomer MegaDoomer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
So you're INTp then?
Probably. Either INTp with some j traits or the other way around. (But due to my former experience with mbti I won't except other possible types. It's a long story... )
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12/03/2010, 07:34 PM
Kittykat Kittykat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 155
Default

Test results

IEE Your result
-----
IEI
EIE These types might also be considered
ILE
-----
SEE
EII These types are not very likely
ILI
LIE
-----
SEI
ESE These types are quite unlikely
SLE
LII
-----
ESI
SLI These types are extremely unlikely
LSE
LSI
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 13/08/2010, 08:39 PM
mystery mystery is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 15
Default can someone give me a rundown of what I just went through or a link to an explanation

ILEYour resultIEEThese types might also be consideredLIEEIESLEThese types are not very likely ILISEELSEIEIThese types are quite unlikely LIIESEEIISLIthese types are extremely unlikely SEILSIESI
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 18/02/2011, 06:55 AM
Neverend's Avatar
Neverend Neverend is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 11
Default

ILI ........Your result

SLI ........These types might also be considered
IEI
LII

SEI ........These types are not very likely
LSI
EII
ESI

ILE .........These types are quite unlikely
SLE
IEE
LIE

SEE ........These types are extremely unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE
____________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2007 SOCIONICS.COM