Go Back   Socionics Forums > Ramble Mumble

Ramble Mumble Anything goes, but please make an effort to stay positive and keep it socionics related.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 17/05/2010, 04:19 AM
bigwhitesquare's Avatar
bigwhitesquare bigwhitesquare is offline
Quarantined
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 76
Default Weird result in the socionics type assistant test

I've done the Socionics Type Assistant test a couple of times now. Yeah, its that really long one where you check off what adjectives describe you and don't describe you. Everytime I've taken it, I get the result of INTx. It never clearly determines my j/p preference. Here's my most recent result:

E/I choice (E - Extraversion, I - Introversion, x - Undefined)

Normal mode: I


Reversed mode: I


Combined mode: I

S/N choice (S - Sensation, N - Intuition, x - Undefined)

Normal mode: N


Reversed mode: N


Combined mode: N




F/T choice (F - Feeling, T - Thinking, x - Undefined)

Normal mode: T


Reversed mode: T


Combined mode: T


Now here's where things get interesting!

J/P choice (j - Judgement, p - Perception, x - Undefined)

Normal mode: Conscious j; unconscious p


Reversed mode: Conscious j; unconscious p


Combined mode: Conscious j; unconscious p






Scoring factor

Normal mode: 0.81


Reversed mode: 0.86


Combined mode: 0.84





The Scoring factor shows how much you are aware of your type and/or the testing procedure. Anything close to and above 0.8 is considered high and could interfere with authenticity of the test outcome.


Summary

Normal mode: INTx


Reversed mode: INTx


Combined mode: INTx





I want to know, what exactly do they mean here by conscious j and unconscious p? Has anyone else taken the test and found that one of your letters couldn't be clearly determined? Did anyone else have one preference that was conscious with the opposite being unconscious?

I suspect maybe its got something to do with the way I'm selecting the adjectives. I see myself as very dependable, reliable, systematic, and careful for example. I am also pretty consistent in my behavior from day to day. On the other hand I rarely see things as being absolutely certain and I am pretty flexible and rather indecisive.

I made sure to mouse over each adjective before making selections to get at a words intended meaning.

Just curious about this particular test result. Most other socionics tests peg me as INTj
__________________
LII/INTj/, intuitive subtype, yadda yadda yadda
5w6 so/sp

Would you like you for a child?

Last edited by bigwhitesquare; 17/05/2010 at 04:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17/05/2010, 04:30 AM
SG's Avatar
SG SG is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,521
Default

Test shows that result is not a clear cut INTj (or INTp), but if anything the p is more likely since it is unconscious choice and is less influenced by conscious decision.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17/05/2010, 05:25 AM
RSV3's Avatar
RSV3 RSV3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SG View Post
Test shows that result is not a clear cut INTj (or INTp), but if anything the p is more likely since it is unconscious choice and is less influenced by conscious decision.
So you are alive; I was getting worried.
__________________
Sociotype.com

Increased expression of one function (1) suppresses the opposing intradichotomy function and (2) suppresses the opposing intrablock function (and vise versa).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17/05/2010, 05:26 AM
SG's Avatar
SG SG is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,521
Default

Yeah man, online gaming...very addictive.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2007 SOCIONICS.COM