View Single Post
Old 05/06/2008, 05:01 AM
RSV3's Avatar
RSV3 RSV3 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 550

Originally Posted by kensi View Post
INTjs will do that a lot (the whole avoiding thing; their just trying to factor in where all of this sits---they're not so direct. They get tied down in some possibility----NeSi--- Neither Ne nor Si can be found in the direct environment but only in the Alpha open-ended blueprint of life)

INTps however are direct (it's a gamma thing NiSe ---change brings about direct senses of the situation which(Se) can accomodate those changes noticed, with intellectual Ni surfing the underlying waters of th esituation)
Also, INTps always want to see the empirical backing for everything where as INTjs don't need a lot of facts and prefer to go purely on theory (however contradictory the theory is to the empirical data). To INTjs as long as their theory is internally logically consistent, the empirical data is secondary.

Furthermore, INTps don't want things to have definite conclusions, they want endless possibilites, no closure, continued expansion, (which is why I gave you the finite v. infinite question which you answered as an INTp would). INTjs want things structured, to find the end to to things, find the boundaries and limits of things; INTjs don't want to be constantly examining an endless stream of possibilites.

Originally Posted by IntjWurm View Post
Well I think INTpwurm sounds's not even a pun anymore...
But come on, the initial pun did have some humor in it.
Alpha NT humor.

Increased expression of one function (1) suppresses the opposing intradichotomy function and (2) suppresses the opposing intrablock function (and vise versa).

Last edited by RSV3; 05/06/2008 at 05:02 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply With Quote