Thread: The Sub Types
View Single Post
  #50  
Old 30/05/2008, 02:51 AM
Cyclops Cyclops is offline
Gone on holiday...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kensi View Post
in light of your last comment i can say some negative things but i wont i wanna focus on the posative only.

As for the theory of me being an ENTp like you said.... is a reasonable choice but i can't go there because i don't seem to have high regard for all the other members of that quadra and all my intertype associations would be completely thrown off. Every new choice in identity and intertype has major consequences.

also..........so u know The biggest problem i've noticed with Si doninant types (relationally) is that they are somewhat bean counters.....they don't see the whole forrest before focusing in on a tree , .....they focus in on a tree first n then go out looking for the forrest.

also i've noticed your "gotcha " comments....this is a sign of one upsmanship which is a Ti auxiliary phenomena.......maybe ur ESTp

just a suggestion pal .......maybe u otta send me a pic if ur handy at all that computer stuff.....also curious how old u r ?
Also what you say here, yes the forest thing can actually apply to all S types, but how you put it, is actually more towards an ISTj than ISTp. You actually seem to be discussing this part from a MBTT POV.

Also, my saying 'gotcha' is actually very genuine. When I said this I did honestly mean I understood and I was also trying to reach out to form an Fi connection. Fact that you read something else into it shows that a quadra (as your so fond of saying ) outwith what i'm trying to demonstrate.. I'm trying to establish Fi with you, but you see it more as, I dunno, Se Fe or something?
Reply With Quote