| Socionics Personals |  | Female
Straight
16-25
Oceania
Libra
ENFj |
|  | Male
Straight
16-25
Middle East
Sagittarius
INTj |
|  | Male
Straight
26-35
North America
Pisces
INXj |
| | Join now! |
Who is who?Learn how to convert between different systems
V.I.An introduction into the widely used Socionics Visual Identification technique
TestsA collection of Socionics related tests and quizes
Q & AsAsk a Socionics related question or provide an answer to an existing one
ArticlesVarious articles on the subject of Socionics and Types in general
ForumsWant to discuss Type? Head to Socionics Forums!
|
| Questions & Answers |
| Question #1232451845 | Tuesday, 20-Jan-2009 |
|
|
| hey- so, I'm curious: I've been doing some digging in Keirsey's "Please Understand Me II", and he recommends the INTP/ENFJ, ENTP/INFJ, INTJ/ENFP, and ENTJ/INFP pairing. Being an Idealist myself, I'm not sure I agree with this. I find myself attracted to Rationals, but idk about forever. What does Socionics say about this? I'm pretty confused. Thanks!! -- Pondering |
Your Answers: 1+ |
| A1 Socionics and MBTI disagree on a fundamental level when it comes to inter-type relations. Socionics' more accurate typing system allows for a more robust description of inter-type relationships. See this link for more details: http://www.socionics.com/rel/rel.htm And a more technical description here: http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Intertype_relations -- Krig (INTj) |
|
|
| A2 Like the devil's advocate I am I must note that while it's true that Socionics has a more detailed and specific system, MBTI doesn't, which kind of obscures the translation by things such as this theory by Keirsey. I prefer Socionics' system compared to Keirsey's opinion however because it is much more reasoned and detailed within its system, unlike Keirsey's opinion which is very much not. -- Anonymous |
| *Please note that the opinions expressed are not necessarily those of socionics.com* |
Page 1 |
| Would you like to add anything? |
(When posting, we ask you to make the effort to qualify your opinions.)
|
|
