| Socionics Personals |  | Female
Straight
16-25
Oceania
Libra
ENFj |
|  | Male
Straight
16-25
Middle East
Sagittarius
INTj |
|  | Male
Straight
26-35
North America
Pisces
INXj |
| | Join now! |
Who is who?Learn how to convert between different systems
V.I.An introduction into the widely used Socionics Visual Identification technique
TestsA collection of Socionics related tests and quizes
Q & AsAsk a Socionics related question or provide an answer to an existing one
ArticlesVarious articles on the subject of Socionics and Types in general
ForumsWant to discuss Type? Head to Socionics Forums!
|
| Questions & Answers |
| Question #1129055144 | Tuesday, 11-Oct-2005 |
|
|
| I took this test and a Meyers Briggs and obtained the same psychological type (intp). Then I proceded to read the intj/p problem and if what that article says is true then I should be the opposite, correct? anyway I was just wondering how this could/can happen and if there is anyway to explain this? -- kangthemad |
Your Answers: 1+ |
| A1 Some socionics INTps take MB test and come out INTP and some socionics INTps take the same test and come out INTJ. If you are in the first group, then you do not need to flip P and J around, if you are in the second group, then you need to flip P and J around. So, which one are you? -- Admin |
|
|
| A2 I have been thinking on this and have reread the intp/j problem article and have another question. You see logical intuitive intratim (gaining a understanding) i bielieve is correct, as well as the dual seeking function but i am questioning on the to be healthy "hiden agenda". It just doesn't fit, so i read them all and i have no idea, i just don't seem to want to hide anything from my fellow man(or woman) because i could care less what they think. could it be because i have the hidden agenda definanition perverted or am just unable to find it correctly? -- Anonymous |
| A3 It is not universally true that INTps are MB INTJs and vice versa. For example, I am an INTj according to socionics and an INTJ according to MB. I believe that this occurs because MB makes no essential distinction in the kind of intuition one possesses. E/I, S/N, T/F, J/P are treated as independent random variables in MB theory, which is a simplifying assumption from a statistical point of view but isn't necessarily true. Further the presumption in MB theory is that if one is a "J" then one's rational function, T or F, is extraverted. However, this is not what Jung meant by the term "judging." By judging Jung meant that one's dominant psychological function is rational. -- Anonymous |
| A4 I recently tested some MBTT questionnaires and found they actually give the Socionics type for introverted "IN"! -- piccolo_michel |
| *Please note that the opinions expressed are not necessarily those of socionics.com* |
Page 1 |
| Would you like to add anything? |
(When posting, we ask you to make the effort to qualify your opinions.)
|
|
