|
|
|
C1 I was doing well with people before I've read this crap  -- Anonymous |
| C2 this has helped me sooooooooooooo much with people....but more with myself. -- Anonymous |
| C3 great -- Anonymous |
| C4 i like toast -- Anonymous |
C5 I wonder the basis and the dynamics of the theory.  -- Anonymous |
| C6 awesome site....cant say i agree with everything but generally speaking really good stuff if viewed the right way...... without intertype the idividual types would make somewhat very little sense............but... why is socionics mbti intertype of Illusion equivalent to mbti's intertype of pedagogue ? .....are there both negative and posative realms for each intertype (eg. negative =illusion and posative= pedagogue ) -- mmm |
| C7 this pseudo-science helped me somewhat -- Anonymous |
| C8 it helped me understand more about the relations i have between my friends -- entp |
| C9 People who disagree with socionics aka "the word of jung",are may be light readers.My advice is do a serious heavy investigation on all the articles,and get rid of your previous bias.I myself was skecptic,then realized this not pop typology The best thing ever.. -- DamagedExtravert |
| C10 the intertype relationship theories puzzle me even more thzan the ppl themselves -- infp?j? |
| C11 call me stupid but i don't understand those symbols at the bottom of the page!! they're kinda freaky. and what the hell is that wheel thing?? -- Anonymous |
| C12 Intertype relations made me realize how horrible my job is, and I realize that I'm stuck with this job. I find it very helpful. Thank you so much. -- Anonymous |
| C13 I don't like it. I am an ENFP, told my ideal partner is INTJ, a personality of which I was coincidentally supremely attracted to loooong before I read this, but then when I read over here about our relationship (Supervisor & Supervisee), it makes it sound like he sees me as the kid who needs protection & I'm over here stomping angry cuz I can't get him to see me as more grown up. You know, that is part of it, but a very small part. What about what the INTJ learns from the ENFP, huh? HMMMM? -- reina (ENFP) |
| C14 Socionics actually made me more confused. . . each time I meet someone new now, I try hard as I can to see beyond their supposed type. -- Hcat |
| C15 It hasn't helped much, and I stll waver in my type opinions. -- Anonymous |
| C16 I'm not sure about a lot of the descriptions I've read. I don't necessarily agree that an S-N pairing is the most ideal situation. Also, I do not agree with ISTJ/INTP relations. Overall, i just don't think this theory has much to stand on. -- INTP |
| C17 The question reads, how helpful have you found knowing the Intertype Relations, not 'has knowledge of Intertype Relations solved all of your problems and furthermore made you almost as rich as Bill Gates.' The theory is just there - you choose whether and how to use it. -- econdude |
| C18 Love this stuff! -- Joe |
| C19 i've met more than 16 different personalities. -- ISTp |
| C20 No two MBTI/Socionics websites I've been to have given the same "best match" for any type. And for me personally, Socionics seems to be the most inaccurate. The people I should get along with, I don't. The people I shouldn't, I do. Unless I'm completely pants at typing people. As it is, though, I'll say this is complete BS. -- someone |
| C21 @c20. ALL Socionics sites have the SAME best match, because Socionics has a unified Intertype Relations theory, which MBTI don't have, period. -- anyone |
| C22 i eat vegimite -- Anonymous |
| C23 As much as I enjoy thinking about it, and then having it help me understand all of it more deeply by extension, I have to say that I've found it frustrating. And I catch myself constantly wondering while reading it that it may be because it was most probably formed based on your re-organizing the orders of functioning as ordered already in Myers-Briggs-typeology. I have to say, I think it was mistake, I've found a few example now of types that I associate with closely where the other orders of function just make more sense, not to mention my own. I think you guys may have something here, but should seriously reconsider forming it around the established function ordering, and then maybe people taking it a bit more seriously would have a better time of it. -- Anonymous |
| C24 It's been so good, i'm planning on wrapping up this website address as a christmas present -- Anonymous |
| C25 No two people of the same types are similar. -- anonymouss |
| C26 I don't agree with the most favourable relationships. As an INTP, I find I get along very well with ENTPs, and not very well at all with ESFPs. -- intp |
| C27 Yeah i somewhat agree with C16... S-N pairing is difficult -- enfp |
| C28 As an INTP, I don't get along well with people, and since I'm in high school, I've effectively sworn myself off of dating until the people mature. One day an ESFP is excited about talking to me, the next day she is making out with some other guy who she had met three days ago. My need for loyalty is my enemy. -- Frango |
| C29 I'm an INFP currently seeing an ESFP...not the best chemistry plus she's loopy...the Intertype Relations of Semi-Duality describe our relationship dead on. ENFPs are much hotter to me; but the ones I've shown interest in were already taken. -- Anonymous |
| C30 This theory is excellent. People who don't like it probably suck at typing people, seriously. For starters, stop regarding MBTI. -- Anonymous |
| C31 This is utter bullshit. The opposite type is definitely not the best partner. -- Anonymous |
C32 -C31- well yeah.......opposite types are coflicting.........the WORST relations..........what is bullshit?, if you are talking about socionics intertype relation theory that is a contadiction because you are corect in that our opposites dont make good relations. if you are talking about mbti you are also right, it is bullshit hahaha-   -- Anonymous |
| C33 I voted somewhat helpful. I think intertype relation descriptions represent the general tendency of what happens when people of two different types get together. In general, duality is the best and conflict is the worst but there are exceptions. Of course intertype relations are only valid if you are *sure* of your own type and the other person's type. -- W-L |
| C34 C28: I am glad I found a statement like this here. I have a high sense of loyalty, kind of Gamma quadra one. I actually have such a high and stupid sense of loyalty that I am loyal to my love for a man whom I cannot have. It is totally impractical nonsense but I cannot help it, there simply isnt any other man and thats just it. - Actually what might help you is show more explicitly whom you want to be friends with. I was trying to talk to an INTp all the elementary and high school and had the feeling she even doesnt know I exist. It is difficult, obviously, to be loyal to a friendship if you are not sure there is a friendship. -- Ezis (ESFp) |
| C35 The idea is pretty interesting and I really love scroll this site up and down. However I get confused sometimes with this theory, as any theory has exceptions. And dealing with people, exceptions are much higher. Generally it is nice tool that helps one get a hint on people behavior, but taking it too serious is not the way. When used concisely can be a useful tool indeed. -- Entj |
| C36 It has helped me understand why my parents argue so much -- INTP |
| C37 C36 has it down. Also explains why I argue with them. ISFJ to my ENTP. Makes sense. -- Anonymous |
| C38 C26, you are most likely a socionic INTj -- Anonymous |
| C39 My friend is an ESFP. I am an INFP. Our relationship has been described as it is. But the bigger problem is that he is an ESFP who has a Histrionic personality disorder. Otherwise, I would be sure that the relationship would be working, because we are witnessing a sort of kindred spirit. -- anonymous |
| C40 C38, are you suggesting that INTJs get along well with ENTPs? I'm an INTJ and my best friend is an ENTP. By the way I really can't get along with ESTJs -- Anonymous |
| C41 I am an ISTP and I don't get on with anyone. -- Anonymous |
| C42 i have learnt a bit what others are thinking but tbh its just a system that floats around in my head that i can sometimes make connections to -- Anonymous |
| C43 Intertypes makes a terrible mistake. It confuses the moral dimension of man with psychological types. A person does not get along with another person because he/she has a personality compatibility. It´s the shared moral values of what builds true relationships. Jungian psychology brought great discoveries in the area of psychology, but jungian made the mistake of trying to "psychologize" everything in an arrogant and unhealthy manner. Great example of this mistake was Carl G. Jung who had extramarital relationships justifying it by saying that these lovers-Tonny Wolff, and others-were "animas" soul mates and his wife had to swallow this BF. This is what I mean when I said that moral values is at the core of all relationships. -- An old pseudoscience |
|
| Would you like to add anything? |
